| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
1. Sticky:Dev Blog: Battle for 6VDT-H - summary and numbers - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
TravelBuoy wrote: 52 minutes needed to kill with a fully megathron fleet a single prophecy, this is a ridiculous thing. Prophecies suck. Get a better fleet doctrine.
- by Lord Zim - at 2013.08.01 16:01:00
|
2. Sticky:Dev Blog: Battle for 6VDT-H - summary and numbers - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Qestroy wrote: stop digging at test for being more "don't give a ****, its a game" than goonswarm and the clusterfuck coalition... That's a different tune than you guys were singing prior to Z9PP, because prior to Z9PP you were winning. Now y...
- by Lord Zim - at 2013.08.01 10:41:00
|
3. Sticky:Dev Blog: Battle for 6VDT-H - summary and numbers - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Mos7Wan7ed wrote: I would rather have 10 battles with 1/10th the ships with 0 Tidi. Tell CCP to fix the sov mechanics to encourage smaller but more numerous fights, then. Mos7Wan7ed wrote: But this is what CCP and all of the failure ridd...
- by Lord Zim - at 2013.08.01 07:17:00
|
4. Sticky:Dev Blog: Battle for 6VDT-H - summary and numbers - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Zimmy Zeta wrote: Just some random thought: How about using a mechanic similar to "drone assist" for really large fleet fights? Get the **** out. Zimmy Zeta wrote: It would make it somewhat boring for your regular grunt, but instead of se...
- by Lord Zim - at 2013.07.31 21:17:00
|
5. Sticky:Dev Blog: Client modification, the EULA and you - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
James Amril-Kesh wrote: Lord Zim wrote: James Amril-Kesh wrote: I also doubt you would agree that EVEMon's cache scraping function should violate the EULA. Personally, I'm still wondering what functions cache scraping provides which act...
- by Lord Zim - at 2013.04.19 08:28:00
|
6. Sticky:Dev Blog: Client modification, the EULA and you - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
James Amril-Kesh wrote: I also doubt you would agree that EVEMon's cache scraping function should violate the EULA. Personally, I'm still wondering what functions cache scraping provides which actually constitutes cheating, and what sort of c...
- by Lord Zim - at 2013.04.19 08:05:00
|
7. Sticky:Dev Blog: Client modification, the EULA and you - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
T RAYRAY wrote: i skipped ahead after page 3 or so. I absolutely think CCP should take a look at the accounts of those players complaining so loudly and splitting hairs in the grey areas in the EULA and look hard into the tools they use to pla...
- by Lord Zim - at 2013.04.19 07:44:00
|
8. Sticky:Dev Blog: Client modification, the EULA and you - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Lord Zim wrote: CCP Peligro wrote: I genuinely do not know how to be any clearer than this: We will only impose penalties on cache scraping if used in connection with other illegal activities in the game (i.e., botting). We will not take act...
- by Lord Zim - at 2013.04.18 21:32:00
|
9. Sticky:Dev Blog: Client modification, the EULA and you - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
CCP Peligro wrote: I genuinely do not know how to be any clearer than this: We will only impose penalties on cache scraping if used in connection with other illegal activities in the game (i.e., botting). We will not take action against cache s...
- by Lord Zim - at 2013.04.18 20:52:00
|
10. Sticky:Dev Blog: Client modification, the EULA and you - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Tippia wrote: GǪbecause it was a focus point of a recent botting incident, and they wanted to clarify that the vain attempts at defending it wereGǪ wellGǪ in vain. And how did that one work, then? Did it, or did it not, violate other terms...
- by Lord Zim - at 2013.04.18 20:33:00
|
11. Sticky:Dev Blog: Client modification, the EULA and you - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Tippia wrote: GǣFor nowGǥ has lasted for a decade and there's nothing to suggest that this will change any time soon. They're not threatening people to ban for it any more than they have in the past. And yet they felt it necessary to mentio...
- by Lord Zim - at 2013.04.18 20:06:00
|
12. Sticky:Dev Blog: Client modification, the EULA and you - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Tippia wrote: Scooter McCabe wrote: Because EVEmon as a 3rd party program uses cache scraping which would be bannable by CCP if this policy actually goes through. GǪand is rather explicitly allowed For now , and we've only gotten that o...
- by Lord Zim - at 2013.04.18 19:49:00
|
13. Sticky:Dev Blog: Client modification, the EULA and you - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Tippia wrote: Lord Zim wrote: Tippia wrote: you happen to notice that none of what you listed is in any way related to cache scraping? And what does cache scraping do that lets me do illegal things? No-one knows until someone figures ...
- by Lord Zim - at 2013.04.18 19:26:00
|
14. Sticky:Dev Blog: Client modification, the EULA and you - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Tippia wrote: you happen to notice that none of what you listed is in any way related to cache scraping? And what does cache scraping do that lets me do illegal things?
- by Lord Zim - at 2013.04.18 19:14:00
|
15. Sticky:Dev Blog: Client modification, the EULA and you - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
CCP Peligro wrote: Code injection bots place additional strain on our systems. They are detrimental to you, the legitimate players ability to enjoy EVE Online. That is why we have these rules in place. We'll further elaborate on this topic duri...
- by Lord Zim - at 2013.04.18 18:48:00
|
16. Sticky:Dev Blog: Client modification, the EULA and you - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Roime wrote: I think you missed the part of the EULA considering cache scraping, which hasn't changed with this announcement. It's always been bannable. From http://oldforums.eveonline.com/?a=topic&threadID=734561&page=1#9: CCP Li...
- by Lord Zim - at 2013.04.18 18:31:00
|
17. Sticky:Dev Blog: Client modification, the EULA and you - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
CCP Peligro wrote: Stillman is not in charge of the people with the ban button, he is CCPs Security Analyst. Our boss is GM Solomon, VP of Customer Relationship Management. The word comes from Team Security as well as CCPs Legal department. ...
- by Lord Zim - at 2013.04.18 18:26:00
|
18. Sticky:Dev Blog: Client modification, the EULA and you - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
CCP Peligro wrote: In the meantime, CCP confirms that we will only impose penalties on cache scraping if used in connection with other illegal activities in the game (i.e., botting). We will not take action against cache scraping for other uses...
- by Lord Zim - at 2013.04.18 18:11:00
|
19. Sticky:Dev Blog: Client modification, the EULA and you - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
CCP Stillman wrote: Uppsy Daisy wrote: Half the player population are now breaking the EULA. Nice job CCP. This really is pathetic. How can you pop up and say half the player base are breaking the EULA and we will 'enforce at our discretion...
- by Lord Zim - at 2013.04.18 17:38:00
|
20. Sticky:Dev Blog: Bounties, Kill Rights, New Modules and War in Retribution - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Of course they didn't.
- by Lord Zim - at 2012.12.05 18:05:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |